基于论证的效度验证模式是一种规定了收集各种效度证据的先后顺序，可以呈现各证据之间内在联系并对这一过程进行评估的效度验证模式。该模式由解释论证和效度论证两部分组成，依据Toulmin模式对效度进行论证。近年来这一模式的影响力在不断扩大，本文详细介绍了这一模式的具体程序和典型特征，并在将其与效度整体观进行比较后指出该模式遵循了效度整体观的核心理念并使其在指导实践上更具可操作性。最后，文章指出该模式有待进一步验证和完善的地方，旨在为国内效度验证实践提供启示。

The argument-based approach to validation, based on Toulmin’s argument model, is a validation framework which prioritizes the collection of different types of evidence, manifests the relationship between them and gauges the process of validation. This approach is composed of two arguments: interpretative argument and validity argument. As this approach has become increasingly influential, the author believes that it is important to introduce its procedures and characteristics. After comparing it with the unified concept of validity, it is pointed out that this approach conforms to the key principles of the unified concept of validity and makes it easy to be operationalized in practice. In the end, this article suggests some issues to be further examined and clarified in this approach, hoping to bring insights into validation practice in China.