国内外语用学实证研究比较: 语料类型与收集方法

季小民, 何荷

外语教学理论与实践 ›› 2014, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (2) : 27.

PDF(540 KB)
PDF(540 KB)
外语教学理论与实践 ›› 2014, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (2) : 27.
“语用学研究方法”专栏

国内外语用学实证研究比较: 语料类型与收集方法

作者信息 +

A comparative study of empirical pragmatic studies at home and abroad: data types and methods of collection

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

研究方法对于语言学研究的重要性不言而喻。对于语用学研究而言,语料选择与收集方法至关重要。本研究以十年来国内外重要期刊上刊载的语用学实证研究文章为依据,聚焦各研究中的语料及其收集方法,并加以比照,探讨中外研究者在不同类型语料的选择、语料类型与研究议题之间的关联以及语料收集的方法的异同,旨在为国内语用学研究者在数据选择及收集方法提供有价值的参考意见。

Abstract

Research methods are of self-evident importance to linguistic studies. For pragmatic research,the choice of data and methods of collection are crucial. Collecting empirical studies published over the last decade in eight journals at home and two abroad, the present paper focuses on the types of data used and the methods of data collection in these articles. Through a detailed comparison,this paper probes into their similarities and differences in choice of data types,methods of data collection and the connection between the methods of data collection and research topics with a view to offering relevant suggestions to domestic researchers in terms of data choice and collection.

关键词

语用学实证研究 / 语料类型 / 收集方法 / 比较

Key words

empirical pragmatic studies / data types / methods of collection / comparison

引用本文

导出引用
季小民, 何荷. 国内外语用学实证研究比较: 语料类型与收集方法[J]. 外语教学理论与实践. 2014, 3(2): 27
JI Xiao-Min, HE He. A comparative study of empirical pragmatic studies at home and abroad: data types and methods of collection[J]. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice. 2014, 3(2): 27

PDF(540 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/