英语动结式和很多汉语动结式的补语一般与宾语发生关系，可是汉语“NP V 累了NP”构式却是一种特殊的现象，其补语具有“过度”、“厌倦”等涵义，且当动词的宾语在常识上又被动词蕴含时，此类动结式的补语仅与主语发生语义关系。当补语不被当成蕴含，且宾语也具有［生命］的特征时，该动结式的补语语义趋向解读就会产生歧义。当有数量词限制具有［生命］的特征的宾语时，补语的主语解读消失。光从纯句法的角度来分析这些情况显得乏力，本文引入句法、语义、语用的因素来综合考察此类现象，认为界定此类动结式中宾语的影子性和信息性，可以更好地确认该动结式中补语的解读归属。

The complement of Ｒesultative Construction is basically object-oriented both in Chinese and English． The Chinese “NP V LEI LE NP”Ｒesultative Construction is a special phenomenon in which the complement conveys a fed-up sense，the object is entailed by the verb and hence the complement can be subject-oriented． When the object is featured ［+ LIFE］，the semantic reference of the complement in this construction becomes ambiguous． When the object is restricted by a quantifier，only object-oriented reading is possible． A purely syntactic interpretation of this phenomenon is weak so a comprehensive approach of syntax，semantics and pragmatics is required to account for this idiosyncrasy．