中国学习者英语规则和不规则动词加工的遮蔽启动实验研究

郑丽娜

外语教学理论与实践 ›› 2018, Vol. 162 ›› Issue (1) : 13.

外语教学理论与实践 ›› 2018, Vol. 162 ›› Issue (1) : 13.
“第二语言词汇加工研究”特别专栏

中国学习者英语规则和不规则动词加工的遮蔽启动实验研究

作者信息 +

Processing of English regular and irregular verbs by Chinese EFL learners: a masked priming study

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

本研究通过遮蔽启动实验探讨了中国学习者对英语规则和不规则动词的加工。结果表明,被试对高频动词的判断准确率高于低频动词,判断速度快于低频动词;规则假词不具有音系相似性效应,而不规则假词具有;低频规则动词和规则假词分解加工,不规则词和高频规则动词的加工不存在分解;规则度没有显著影响被试对英语规则和不规则动词的加工。被试利用记忆系统加工不规则词和高频规则动词,利用计算系统加工低频规则词和规则假词,符合双机制理论。

Abstract

This study investigated the processing of English regular and irregular verbs by Chinese EFL learners with a masked priming task. The results showed that their response accuracy of high-frequency verbs was higher than that of low-frequency verbs, and their response time of high-frequency verbs was shorter than that of low-frequency verbs. Regular nonce verbs did not show phonological similarity effects, but irregular ones did. Decomposition was evidenced for the low-frequency regular verbs and regular nonce verbs, but not for the irregular verbs and the high-frequency regular verbs. In addition, regularity did not seem to play a role in their processing of English regular and irregular verbs. The results indicate that the Chinese EFL learners in the present study processed irregular verbs and high-frequency regular verbs with memory, but low-frequency regular verbs and regular nonce verbs with computation, which supports the dual-mechanism theories.

关键词

/ tab-stops: 315.75pt">启动 / 规则动词 / 不规则动词 / 词频 / 音系相似性

Key words

/ text-indent: 21pt">priming / regular verbs / irregular verbs / frequency / phonological similarity

引用本文

导出引用
郑丽娜. 中国学习者英语规则和不规则动词加工的遮蔽启动实验研究[J]. 外语教学理论与实践. 2018, 162(1): 13
ZHENG Li-Na. Processing of English regular and irregular verbs by Chinese EFL learners: a masked priming study[J]. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice. 2018, 162(1): 13

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/