Reading Classical Literary Works and Peer Review

CHEN Mao-Qing, LI Hong-Hong, GAO Hui-Rong

Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice ›› 2013, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (1) : 71-78.

PDF(895 KB)
PDF(895 KB)
Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice ›› 2013, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (1) : 71-78.
Paper

Reading Classical Literary Works and Peer Review

Author information +
History +

Abstract

In this research, the subjects, a class of second-year English majors conducted peer review in criticizing classical literary works in the course of extensive reading. Through questionnaire, and by comparing and analyzing the subjects’ first drafts and final drafts, this research revealed that the peer review in surface form was more than that in content, and that peer review showed a high correctness ratio and stimulated the subjects to make more efforts in their reading and writing. Compared with teacher review, peer review showed merely a slightly lower acceptance among the subjects. Through peer review, the subjects achieved a better understanding of classical literary works, improved their writing, enhanced mutual understanding and did some preparation for career training as prospective teachers.

Key words

classical literary works / peer review / teacher review / extensive reading

Cite this article

Download Citations
CHEN Mao-Qing, LI Hong-Hong, GAO Hui-Rong. Reading Classical Literary Works and Peer Review[J]. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice. 2013, 02(1): 71-78
PDF(895 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/