本文采用文献动态计量方法,借助引文可视化分析软件CiteSpace V 绘制语境论与语义最简论之争的动态知识图谱｡研究发现:近30年来语境论与语义最简论之争由哲学一统江湖到哲学与语言学二分天下,且后者势头强劲,逐步摆脱哲学的束缚,渐成独立的研究分支｡在研究动向上,语用学与哲学主战场不谋而合,前者表现为对客观主义真值条件论的反省或背弃,后者表现为从客观真理到主观真理的转向｡

This article adopts CiteSpace V to make a bibliometric analysis of the debate between Contextualism and Semantic Minimalism from A&HCI and SSCI database. By integrating two sources of evidence—scientific statistical data and stereoscopic intellectual structure, we attempt to detect and visualize the transient patterns and emerging trends and frontiers in this area. The results reveal that the debate was previously dominated by philosophers and then is divided between philosophers and linguists, with the former initiating a turn from objective truth to subjective truth, and the latter questioning or even renouncing the objective truth-conditional semantics in favor of a pioneering branch—truth-conditional pragmatics.